Statement by SASHG on 15/01/2019 in response to racist comments made by James Watson

As African scientists, clinicians and counsellors in the field of genetics, the SASHG respect James Watson’s historical contribution to the discovery of the structure of DNA.

However, we categorically reject his – or any other – attempt to link intelligence and race through genetics.

Any claims of genetic superiority of one race over another are misleading, inaccurate and offensive.

Watson’s prejudiced comments are unacceptable, and we unequivocally condemn them, and this way of thinking.

The SASHG strives for fairness and unbiased principles in the science, teaching and practise of human genetics.

The Southern African Society for Human Genetics (SASHG) committee

Relevant links:

Statement by SASHG on 14/03/2019 – updated on 16/04/2019

We have been made aware that Prof. Muntaser Ibrahim (founding member of the AfSHG) has been detained in Sudan following a peaceful protest. Please see the African Society of Human Genetics website and the article in Science for more details.

We would appreciate it if the SASHG community supports the efforts for Prof. Ibrahim’s release.


The Southern African Society for Human Genetics (SASHG) committee

Update (16/04/2019)

Statement by Prof A. Wonkam, President of AfSHG (12/04/2019)

“We are glad to inform you that Prof Muntaser Ibrahim was released yesterday 11 April 2019.

Thanks to all people of good will , from African and international communities, that has directly or indirectly contribute to facilitate this positive outcome.”

Statement regarding need for sensitivity surrounding labels for South African ethnic groups by SASHG committee on 26/04/2019

We recognise that preferred identifiers (labels) for South African ethnic groups vary between individuals, groups, nations and organisations. This topic has been raised and discussed by the SASHG for over 10 years. In 2013, an attempt was made to come to an agreement within the SASHG membership, over which labels to use. No consensus has been reached, and it is unlikely that one will be reached without further discussion.

Whereas in the rest of Africa (and globally), the names of ethnic groups may not have negative connotations, in South Africa the different names for ethnic groups come from a past and an Apartheid regime that attached social imperatives. There has therefore been an understandable move away from using racial or ethnic based classifications, when it is inappropriate, and unless there is compelling reason to use them.

It is important to clarify that the use of any recommended nomenclature for population groups is to be more strategic in providing genetic/genomic/counselling services to the public in a resource-limited healthcare environment. The objective is to not legitimise the use of labels unnecessarily, but to improve deliverables in health. In the field of medical genetics, we strive to understand shared genetic material, especially where there is an association between such shared material and a disease phenotype.

In the absence of consensus on “appropriate” labels, and until such an agreement is reached, we (as the current committee of the SASHG) can only recommend that individuals and groups throughout the country consider and discuss this issue, and ensure that the terminology they are using is not offensive. In addition, it may be relevant to include some details on the location of recruitment including the Province, city, hospital etc. as this may be more useful than a single ethnic label.

If a label is used, it should be accompanied by an explanation of what it refers to and, importantly, why it is being used.

In conclusion, there is a need for sensitivity as some labels that are currently used in publications and presentations are not appropriate and could send out the wrong message to the South African public.

Have vacancies to share?

If you have news, vacancies or training positions to share with the SASHG community, please complete the submission form and submit it to us for consideration.